Services

Three ways to work together. Each one scoped to change a decision.

Summit Epi Analytics keeps a deliberately small surface area. Three engagement types, fixed structures, public price ranges. Choose the one that matches the decision in front of you — or write to us and we will help you choose.

Compare the three engagement types by duration, price range, and best fit.
Engagement Duration Range Best fit
Trial Design Review 3 weeks $5,000 – $15,000 A planned cluster-randomized or stepped-wedge trial that you want stress-tested for interference and identifiability before data collection.
Decision-Grade Modeling Brief 6–8 weeks $30,000 – $60,000 A ministry, donor, or program-level decision that needs a mechanistic, stochastic, or agent-based model built in partnership with named client-affiliated statisticians.
Biosecurity Diligence Sprint 2 weeks $10,000 – $20,000 An investor, agency, or prime evaluating a specific surveillance or outbreak-tech product, especially in the post-Ginkgo procurement window.

Larger engagements ($40K–$80K+) and subcontract PI roles on academic primes' grants are accepted selectively. Write to us with the analysis plan and prime PI.

Engagement details

External review

Trial Design & Evaluation

Independent design and analysis review for cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, and ring-vaccination trials in ID and emerging-pathogen contexts and evaluation of collective or network-aware interventions. Interference, contamination, and identifiability handled explicitly — not assumed away.

  • HIV / TB / malaria prevention consortia (HPTN, HVTN, Aurum, IMPAACT)
  • Vaccine evaluation consortia (CEPI, GAVI, malaria vaccine groups)
  • Regulatory reviewers needing independent statistical review
  • Academic primes needing a subcontract PI with this expertise
Engagement details →
Modeling support

Decision-Grade Modeling

Mechanistic, stochastic, and agent-based models for ministries of health, NGOs, and donor-funded programs — co-developed with client-affiliated statisticians, anchored in a real methodological contribution, ending in reusable open code.

  • Rwanda Biomedical Centre · Botswana–Harvard Partnership
  • Africa CDC and LMIC ministry equivalents
  • Wellcome Leap, Gates Foundation, Schmidt Sciences as funders
  • LSHTM / Imperial / UCT consortia for subcontract PI roles
Engagement details →
Idea 3 · Time-sensitive

Biosecurity Evaluation

Independent technical due diligence on biosecurity, surveillance, and outbreak-tech products in the post-Ginkgo procurement window. Insider knowledge of what these systems actually deliver, applied honestly.

  • Impact investors and biosecurity-focused funds
  • BARDA, CDC, ASPR, and LMIC public health agencies
  • Defense and biotech primes evaluating partners or acquisitions
  • Former Ginkgo clients searching for replacements
Engagement details →
How an engagement runs

A predictable shape. No surprises in scope, deliverable, or price.

1 · Scoping call

30 minutes, no charge

We confirm the question, the decision it serves, the stakeholders, and the deadline. If the work isn't a fit — for capacity or for principle — we say so and refer where we can.

2 · Statement of work

Fixed fee, fixed deliverables

A one-page SOW with the question, the methods, the deliverable, the timeline, the price, and the publication and embargo terms. Signed before any analysis begins.

3 · Delivery & debrief

Memo + working session

Written deliverable on schedule, followed by a 60–90 minute working session with the decision-makers. Optional follow-on co-authorship for trial and modeling engagements.